|
Dr. John Cramer
|
COR
402 Scientific Revolutions |
Office G317 Ext. 8408 |
|
Fall 2004 |
jcramer@oglethorpe.edu |
|
Syllabus |
|
Course
Description
This course
is one of two options that fulfill the Core science
requirement. By looking at two or more “revolutions” in
science, we will investigate how scientists go about
developing an understanding of the natural world and how
cultural, economic, and personal motivations affect that
development.
First, we
will examine the “Copernican Revolution,” the change from
Greek science to Newtonian science. As it is “ancient
history,” we should be able to view dispassionately and
learn from what was at times a volatile controversy.
We will then
move on to Rare Earth hypothesis, the growing consensus that
planets sustaining intelligent life are very rare. It
constitutes a sort of reversal of the Copernican revolution
but is only a potential revolution at this point.
Nonetheless, it provides a good point of departure to
consider questions about the status of humans in the
universe.
The
scientific way of understanding our universe is distinct
from other ways of knowing. The physical sciences look
outward toward the external world rather than inward. Also,
a primary distinguishing characteristic of science is its
reliance on experimentation both for the determination of
scientific values and for the resolution of disagreements
among its practitioners.
By nature
then, science courses emphasize investigation of physical
phenomena with activities and demonstrations that elucidate
the phenomena and their explanations. Pedagogy in a
physical science course thus tends toward lecture and
demonstration with activities and discussion of the
activities and demonstrations.
Textbooks and
Class Materials
Texts for this
course will be Arthur Koestler’s The Sleepwalkers and The
Copernican Revolution by Thomas Kuhn. Material from other
sources will be supplied to the class as needed. In
addition, we will use materials I have prepared in A Brief
History of Physical Science and How Alien Would Aliens Be?
All these materials are available in the University
Bookstore.
Attendance Policy
Poor class
attendance naturally affects learning. Because classes will
be activity oriented, attendance will be taken. The fifth
absence from class will incur a (+/-) letter grade penalty
on the course grade. Absences beyond that point will incur
a quarter (+/-) letter grade penalty each.
Contact
I am best
contacted by email (address above). Voice mail is second
best. This syllabus is posted on my website at
www.facstaff.oglethorpe.edu/jcramer/.
Quizzes, Writing
Assignments, and the Final Examination
There will be 13
weekly reading quizzes on Thursdays beginning on September
2. You will be graded on the best 10 of the 13. The Final
Exam on Dec. 9 at 8:00 AM will be cumulative. You will have
2 papers assigned on Copernican Revolution topics and 1
paper on the Rare Earth Hypothesis. Papers will be 4 to 6
pages long. You will be given the questions for the papers
well before the due dates (see below). Due dates for the
papers will be Sept. 21, Oct. 21, and Nov. 23.
Grading
The final grade
will be composed of 20% for each of three papers, 20% final
exam grade, and 20% for the quizzes. The letter grade will
be assigned from the grading scale in the Oglethorpe
University Bulletin.
Extra Credit
You may earn as
much as 10 points of extra credit in one of three ways. You
may write an additional paper on a topic of your choice, you
may do a project, or you may do a class presentation. All
choices must be approved by the instructor by Nov. 4 and
must be completed by Nov. 30.
University
Policies
We will follow
standard university policies as detailed in the Academic
Regulations and Policies section of the current university
bulletin with respect to course withdrawal,
satisfactory/unsatisfactory grading options, incompletes and
the honor code.
Weekly Lecture
and Reading Schedule
Key: TSW =
Koestler’s The Sleepwalkers, TCR = Kuhn’s The Copernican
Revolution, BHS = A Brief History of Physical Science, HAW
= How Alien Would Aliens Be?
| Week |
Topic |
Reading |
| 1. |
Pre-Socratic
Greeks – concepts of matter, cosmos |
BHS
chapters 1-3 |
| 2. |
Pre-Socratics
Greeks – Pythagoreans, the Atomists |
BHS chapters
4, 5 |
| 3. |
Plato and
Aristotle – physics and cosmology |
TSW Part 1 |
| 4. |
Later Greeks –
ending with Ptolemy |
TSW Parts 2, 3 |
| 5. |
Dark Ages to
Reformation |
TSW
Part 4 |
| 6. |
Tycho, Kepler |
TSW Part 5, Epilogue |
| 7. |
Galileo,
Descartes |
TCR chapters 1, 2 |
| 8. |
Newton and the
Newtonian Synthesis
|
TCR chapters 3,4 |
| 9. |
Post Newton,
Cosmology |
TCR chapters 5,6 |
| 10. |
summary
of a Revolution, intelligence |
TCR
chap. 7, HAW chap. 1, 2 |
| 11. |
A good star |
HAW chapter 3 |
| 12. |
A good planet |
HAW chapter 4 |
| 13. |
An alien’s planet |
HAW chapters 6,7 |
Bibliography
Classic Histories
of Science
The Origins of
Modern Science by Herbert Butterfield
Science since
1500 by H. T. Pledge, New York, Harper Torchbooks Science
Library, 1959
A History of
Western Science by Anthony Alioto, Englewood Cliffs, New
Jersey, Prentice-Hall, 1987
The Evolution of
Physical Science by Cecil J. Schneer, New York, Grove Press,
1960
Foundations of
Modern Physical Science by Gerald Holton and Duane Roller,
Reading, Mass.,Addison-Wesley,1958
The Fabric of the
Universe by Stephen Toulmin and Jane Goodfield
The Beginnings of
Western Science by David C. Lindberg
Science and the
Makings of the Modern World by John Marks
Books on Greek Science:
The Physical
World of the Greeks by S. Sambursky (trans. Merton Dagert),
Princeton, Princeton Univ. Press, 19871
Physics of the
Stoics by S. Sambursky (trans. Merton Dagert), Princeton,
Princeton Univ. Press, 1987
The Physical
World of Late Antiquity by S. Sambursky (trans. Merton
Dagert), Princeton, Princeton Univ. Press, 1987
Readings in the history of physical
science:
Source Book in
Physics by William Francis Magie, McGraw-Hill, 1935
Major statements of the importance of
the personal element in science: Personal Knowledge by
Michael Polanyi
Creativity and
Intuition by Hideki Yakawa
For an indication of Newton's impact on
experimental science:
Benjamin
Franklin's Science by I. Bernard Cohen, Cambridge, Harvard
Univ. Press, 1990
More information on Galileo:
Galileo: Pioneer
Scientist by Stillman Drake, Toronto, Univ. of Toronto
Press, 1990
Galileo: Heretic
by Pietro Redondi, Princeton, Princeton Univ. Press, 1987
More information on Einstein:
"Subtle is the
Lord...",the Science and Life of Albert
Einstein by
Abraham Pais, Oxford, Oxford Univ. Press, 1982
Some popular books on the big bang theory:
God and the
Astronomers by Robert Jastrow, New York, W.W. Norton &
Company, 1978
A Brief History
of Time by Stephen Hawking
Writing
Assignments
Fall 2004
In all writing
assignments, use subheadings in bold print. Using them has
two functions: it forces the writer to consider the
structure of the material of the essay and it helps the
reader to see that structure. Write a 4 to 6 page essay on
the following:
Writing
Assignment 1
In his The Origin
of Science and the Science of Its Origin, Stanley L. Jaki
contends that Greek science “proved to be a miscarriage or
stillbirth of time.” In what sense is this true? What
prevented Greek science from becoming real science?
You will need to
look into works on the history of science listed in the
Bibliography of the syllabus. Other sources:
The Origin of
Science and the Science of Its Origin by Stanley L. Jaki
Science and the
Making of the Modern World by John Marks
A History of
Western Science by Anthony Alioto
The Beginnings of
Western Science by David C. Lindberg
Writing
Assignment 2
Consider the
history of science from the Greeks through the Reformation
beginnings of modern science. Modern science rose and has
progressed since that time. From this background, argue
either that 1) science and technology arose inevitably or 2)
science and technology might never have arisen. I don’t
care which you choose but I want you to argue it well with
good, well-chosen examples and thoughtful well-made points.
Writing
Assignment 3
Suppose that, at
least in our galaxy and the nearby galaxies, there really
are no intelligent aliens. We are alone in the “local
group” of galaxies. From what we know of scientific
revolutions and change, discuss how the scientific community
is likely to react to that “fact.” What control beliefs will
be operative and what changes in control beliefs will be
necessary? In what way is the change likely to be
controversial and emotional? What responses are available
to ameliorate the force or impact of the change? Note: this
question requires you to speculate. Nonetheless, try to be
realistic about it.
|