Home

Office Hours

Courses

Curriculum
Vitae

Faculty

Petrelnet

 



POL 201
Constitutional Law

Dr. Knippenberg

Phone: 364-8341

Email: jknippenberg@facstaff.oglethorpe.edu

One of the unique aspects of American politics is the role the Constitution plays in everyday political discourse. More often than not, claims about the rights of individuals, the duties and functions of offices and institutions, and the intentions of the Founders find their way into our political debates. Everyone, moreover, acknowledges the political significance of decisions handed down by the Supreme Court, supposedly the final arbiter of the meaning of the Constitution.

All of this is no accident. Those who wrote the Constitution intended for it to provide a standard for judging the relationship of the various parts of our government to one another and of the government as a whole to us.

Having said this, two questions remain. What are the standards embodied in the Constitution? And how are these standards to be applied in American political life?

Most courses in constitutional law implicitly answer both these questions in roughly the same way: in adjudicating particular disputes under the Constitution, the Supreme Court authoritatively states its meaning and applies its standards. Thus most constitutional law courses consist in a consideration of a series of Supreme Court decisions and almost nothing else.

The premise of this course will be somewhat different. We will focus primarily on the Constitution and only secondarily on what the Court has said about it. There are two reasons for this focus. First, some parts of the Constitution are not controversial and some disputes under the Constitution are not easily justiciable. Supreme Court decisions tend to leave these provisions out of account, thereby affording us only a partial view of the document. Second, it is not clear that the Supreme Court's rulings are, or ought to be, infallibly determinative of the meaning of the Constitution. (In this connection, we need only consider Dred Scott and Plessy v. Ferguson.) Were the Court infallible and incontrovertible, it would be, not one of three putatively co-equal branches of government, but the ultimate ruling power. A constitutional political system need not, however, be a judicial tyranny.

With such considerations in mind, we as citizens will exercise our "constitutional right" to think about the Constitution, deriving guidance from whatever sources seem helpful to us.

TEXTS:

Please purchase the following books:

Rossum and Tarr, American Constitutional Law, 5th ed.
(two volumes)
Robert P. George, ed., Great Cases in Constitutional Law

You may find full texts of Supreme Court decisions at one or more of the following websites:

http://court.it-services.nwu.edu/oyez/
http://supct.law.cornell.edu/supct
http://www.fedworld.gov.supcourt/index.htm
http://www.findlaw.com/casecode/supreme.html

ASSIGNMENTS AND GRADING:

Three case briefs…………………………………………….30% total
Due:
the day the case is discussed in class*
One 10-15 pp. Essay………………………………………..30%
Due:
Tuesday, November 21
Class presentation..………………………………………….10%
Class participation…………………………………………..10%
Final examination………………………………………...…20%
Due:
Thursday, December 14

*Note that you must submit one brief no later than Tuesday, October 10

ACADEMIC POLICIES AND REGULATIONS:

In accordance with Oglethorpe's Honor Code, all the work you hand in must be pledged: "I have neither given nor received any unauthorized aid in completing this assignment." For the purposes of this course, "unauthorized aid" consists in plagiarism, i.e., representing someone else's words or research as your own. If in completing an assignment you rely on secondary sources, be sure to cite them properly. Unless I announce otherwise, you may discuss any assignment with your colleagues, but the work you submit must be your own.

Attendance is mandatory. I reserve the right to give the grade "FA" to students who regularly miss class.

I am happy to help you plan your academic schedule and so will grant extensions on assignments to those who request them one week in advance. Unless, however, you have a medical excuse, I will penalize late papers two points per weekday up to a total of ten points. I will not accept papers more than five weekdays overdue.

If for some reason you have to take an "Incomplete" in this course, you must arrange it with me before the end of the semester. We must agree to a contract containing a schedule for the completion of the course requirements.

You may find the grading scale, as well as a statement of the policy governing the S/U option in the 1998 - 2000 Oglethorpe University Bulletin.

TENTATIVE SCHEDULE OF READINGS

I. Constitutionalism (9/5)
Read:
Federalist
#33
RT, vol. I, ch. 1

II. Judicial Review (9/7)
Read:
Federalist
#78
RT, vol. I, ch. 3 (pp. 51-73)
Marbury v. Madison
Eakin v. Raub

George, chs. 1 and 2

III. The Function of the Supreme Court (9/12)
Read:
RT, vol. I, ch. 2

IV. The Supremacy of the Constitution (9/14)
Read:
Martin v. Hunter's Lessee
McCullogh v. Maryland


V. The Legislative Branch (9/19)
Read:
RT, vol. I, ch. 4 (pp. 115-132)
Schechter Poultry Corp. v. United States
INS v. Chadha

VI. The Executive Branch (9/21)
Read:
RT, vol. I, ch. 5 (pp. 171-182)
Myers v. United States
Morrison v. Olson
United States v. Nixon
Youngstown Sheet and Tube v. Sawyer
Clinton v. City of New York

VII. War and Foreign Affairs (9/26)
Read:
RT, vol. I, ch. 6
War Powers Resolution
U.S. v. Curtiss-Wright Export Corp.
Missouri v. Holland
Ex parte Milligan
Korematsu v. U.S.

VIII. Federalism and National Power (9/28)
Read:
RT, vol. I, chs. 7 and 8
Cohens v. Virginia
Garcia v. SAMTA
Gibbons v. Ogden
Civil Rights Cases
Hammer v. Dagenhart
NLRB v. Jones and Laughlin Steel Co.
Heart of Atlanta Motel v. U.S.

IX. Rights in General (10/3)
Read:
RT, vol. II, ch. 3 (all, including cases)

X. Substantive Due Process Before the Switch (10/5, 10/10)
Read:
RT, vol. II, ch. 4 (pp. 77-92)
George, chs. 5 and 6
The Slaughterhouse Cases
Munn v. Illinois
Lochner v. New York
West Coast Hotel Company v. Parrish
United States v. Carolene Products Company

XI. Freedom of Speech, Press, and Association (10/12 - 19)
Read:
RT, vol. II, ch. 5 (pp. 128-154)
Gitlow v. New York
Schenk v. United States
Dennis v. United States
Barenblatt v. United States
Brandenburg v. Ohio
Buckley v. Valeo
Texas v. Johnson
R.A.V. v. City of St. Paul
Near v. Minnesota
Miller v. California
Paris Adult Theater v. Slaton
Indianapolis Anti-Pornography Ordinance
Evans v. Romer

XII. Freedom of Religion (10/24 - 11/2)
Read:
RT, vol. II, ch. 6 (pp. 206-220)
Everson v. Board of Education
School District of Abington Township v. Schempp
Lemon v. Kurtzman
Wallace v. Jaffree
Edwards v. Aguillard
(handout)
Lee v. Weisman
Lynch v. Donnelly (handout)
Allegheny County v. Greater Pittsburgh ACLU (handout)
Capital Square Review and Advisory Board et al. v. Pinette et al. (handout)
Santa Fe I.S.D. v. Doe (handout)
West Virginia Board of Education v. Barnette
Sherbert v. Verner
Lyng v. Northwest Indian Cemetary Protection Association
Employment Division v. Smith

Church of the Lukumi Babalu Aye v. Hialeah (handout)
Religious Freedom Restoration Act
City of Boerne, Texas, v. Flores

XIII. Equal Protection and Discrimination (11/7 - 21)
Read:
RT, vol II. chs. 8, 9, and 10 (pp. 377-403, 452-474, 536-551)
George, chs. 7 and 8
Plessy v. Ferguson
Brown v. Board of Education (1954)
Brown v. Board of Education (1955)
Swann v. Charlotte-Mecklenburg Board of Education
Milliken v. Bradley
Missouri v. Jenkins
Moose Lodge No. 107 v. Irvis
Wards Cove Packing Co. v. Antonio
Civil Rights Act of 1991
Bakke v. Regents of the University of California
Regents v. Bakke
Richmond v. Croson Company
Frontiero v. Richardson
Adarand v. Pena
Reynolds v. Sims
Shaw v. Reno
Miller v. Johnson
(handout)

XIV. Privacy (11/28 - 12/5)
Read:
RT, vol II, ch. 11 (pp. 574-590)
Griswold v. Connecticut
Roe v. Wade

Webster v. Reproductive Health Services (handout)
Planned Parenthood v. Casey
Bowers v. Hardwick


XV. Conclusions (12/7)



 


About Oglethorpe | Academics | Admissions | Campus Life | Alumni & Giving
News & Events | Athletics | OU Museum
Home | Search | Site Map | Contact Us

Oglethorpe University
4484 Peachtree Rd., N.E.
Atlanta, GA 30319-4484
(404) 364-8307 or toll free at
1-800-428-4484